| The Saint |
October 9th, 2009 09:18 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by pusangani
(Post 1080380)
if people cared for electric recoil then everyone would be using one, not so?
|
False logic.
EBBR with notable recoil has only been attempted recently, first by TM, then a couple others. Previous attempts by G&G didn't count, simply because they were mainly focused on simulating bolt cycle.
Throw in the fact that TM SOPMOD/SOCOM requires new magazine (well worth it for dry fire stop) and battery, and backwards parts compatibility is poor, the current champ of EBBR is on par with a high end AEG (it is a high end AEG).
But this is all mute for Canada. Given our situation, we'll always be somewhat behind the rest of the airsoft world no matter which what feature catches on.
Quote:
the fact that ebb has failed to deliver a realistic experience is what has fueled different companies to pursue the gbbr market, because airsofters see it as a truer more realistic experience, myself included, and I will probably get one of those once they become more affordable and fieldable.
|
While it's true that EBBRs probably can't ever have has much recoil as GBBRs, it's just the same that GBBRs will probably never match EBBRs in terms of reliability and fps stability across temperature ranges.
Though, the better GBBRs are perfectly fieldable now and are fielded in both skirms and milsims (maybe not so much in Canada), provided the shooter doesn't treat it like an AEG and temperature isn't jumping between freezing and super hot. |
